By Clicking on the photo it will allow you to view larger version.
After clicking it will take you to flickr.
Once there above the photo click All Sizes.
Hey presto, Enlarged photo.
Answer from Justice minister but note it was passed to the sole sponsers of SCCRC Justice Department What a Joke:
I just had to reply to this Blase Reply and this can be seen here:
Be sure to watch out for further letters to Justice Minister concerning SCCRC and also The Standards Commissioner for Scotland with their replies.
Their replies certainly show a culture of cover up and lack of investigation into the conduct of SCCRC and allows them (SCCRC) to do what they want, when they want, and all sanctioned by the Justice Minister and Justice Department.
Chief Executive of SCCRC can be seen here:
Response to latest reply informing me wrongly that i could complain to The Standards Commissioner who in turn wrote back saying they could not investuigate my type of complaints.
Basically bar taking Judicial review against SCCRC there is no one to whom you can complain.
When i did complain to SCCRC the person whom i was complaining of answered my complaints Gerard Sinclair "Flasher" seen above deals with all complaints even ones directed against him.
The reply listed below was sent despite them knowing i had no access to the internet ?
For the avoidance of doubt J Clark Pearson sits on the board of the user group set up by SCCRC to discuss policies etc, see here:
Stakeholders’Views
The Commission has also set up a User Group Forum
whose members comprise:
The Commission’s Chief Executive, Director of
Administration and Senior Legal Officer;
Tom Higgins, Appeals Manager Justiciary Office;
Lindsay Anderson, Crown Office Policy Group;
Chief Superintendent Janette Joyce, Strathclyde Police;
Stuart Sproul, Prison Officer, HMP Shotts;
Graham Walker, Criminal Defence Solicitor;
William McVicar, Criminal Defence Solicitor; and
Clark Pearson, Scottish Executive Justice Department.
Thie above can be found on page 19 of the annual report of SCCRC for 2004-2005 Here:
http://www.sccrc.org.uk/viewfile.aspx?id=97
Quite clearly he should not be dealing in any way with complaints against someone he knows.
This shows our Last Government allowed conflicts of interest like this to flourish and did absolutely Hee Haw to protect the public interests in conflicts like this.
Indeed it was the First and Justice Ministers that passed my complaints to Pearson.
Be sure to look again in a few days time when the Standards Commissioner's letters will be published.
The standards commissioner whom Justice Minister said i could complain!!!!
Letters from Standards commissioner:
Confidential to myself, No chance when they choose to cover matters up and refuse to fully explore my complaints.
If Taylor resigns in Lockerbie then he should have done the same 2 years previous when my own case and complaints against him were accepted for review by SCCRC
Quite clearly another whitewash.
Why was i told to complain to someone who could not deal with my type of complaints.
Mr Taylor resigned once the Lockerbie Bomber appealed to allow SCCRC to remain independent and Impartial, This being the case why did Taylor not resign in 2001 when my case against him was accepted for review.
SCCRC allowed Mr Taylor to remain on the Commission despite me making serious allegations about the way he handled my trial, In particular his Incompetence and Negligence.
Where was the Independence and Impartiality that i was entitled to the same as Megrahi.
Be sure to look out for next paper chasing tactics and further complaints against SCCRC Here.
No comments:
Post a Comment