When i complained to Law Society that Jim Keegan Solicitor had lied to SCCRC when he said that at the time of my trial, He would not have been given access to the crown precognitions, Infact the crown are still quite cagey about releasing such documents now.
Seen Here:
The Law Society did not interview Robin Johnston of SCCRC to ascertain if indeed Mr Keegan used these words or not.
They allowed Keegan to claim he had difficulty remembering the details of my case well at least this is what they are claiming.
They came to the conclusion that the Statement made by Keegan to SCCRCs Senior Legal Officer was at best only another persons interpretation of what another has said and dismissed my complaint out of hand.
Mr keegan told the Law Society also that the author of his statement was mistaken and can be viewed here:
Surely they could not allow this without interviewing Robin Johnston ??? Yes they did.
Mr Keegan has now claimed to the Law Society that if the witness statements were amongst the documents he handed me in 1982 then the witnesses must have refused to co-operate.
This was not investigated by law Society, Even though i claimed Keegan was a liar again.
He is now trying to claim my family including my Brother and Father along with my Aunt and Cousins refused to co-operate, This is not the case.
If Law Society had bothered to investigate they would find out that Keegan did not attempt to interview any of them before my trial.
Law Society's opinion can be viewed here:
And Here
And Here
Basically in a nutshell, Either Keegan or Johnston has lied, Certainly Keegan is now trying to backtrack on his statement.
Certainly Law Society lacked proper investigation.
Certainly now Keegan is saying something totally different from what SCCRC said he had said causing concern among SCCRC and Lawyers alike.
Did the Law Society investigate independently and Impartially? No, They never investigated at-all
No comments:
Post a Comment